RT @axios: New data from the Axios/Harris poll finds that public perception of companies is deeply impacted by how much those companies can…
Last week I joined @cheddar w @dmccabe from @axios to discuss the Axios Harris Poll 100 corporate #reputation ranki… https://t.co/qRDqO1X97D
RT @HarrisPoll: Live at #SXSW #girlslounge Male Champions for Change w CEO @johngerzema https://t.co/4NfwC8VnYa
RT @HarrisPoll: Attending #SXSW? Don't miss @HarrisPoll CEO @johngerzema & @femalequotient CEO @ShelleyZalis's panel 'HR in the Post #MeToo
RT @ShaiReshef: Thought-provoking findings by my friend @johngerzema and @HarrisPoll regarding Gen Z and Millenial attitudes #Millenials #G
Are young people embracing socialism or simply redefining it? Our ⁦@axios⁩ ⁦@HarrisPoll⁩ #SXSW2019 panel discussing… https://t.co/XRUtiO75Ds
About to start our ⁦@axios⁩ ⁦@HarrisPoll⁩ #SXSW2019 Panel: Gen Z is poised to revolutionize politics #GenZ #politics https://t.co/5zPe62qfgo
Our Axios Harris Poll shows Gen Z/Millennials favor more socialism in their govt from universal healthcare to tuiti… https://t.co/Vi7IfneOb2
RT @WendySalomon1: Pleased to help @Wegmans celebrate their #1 ranked #reputation in America! @HarrisPoll https://t.co/zzdfJi2DP4
"Girl Up is just the start of a life-long journey." Felicia says that @GirlUp helped her find her voice. Join me in… https://t.co/lbz0SddBLL
RT @HarrisPoll: Tune in to @cheddar today at 10:30 am EST to watch @HarrisPoll CEO @johngerzema & @axios #Tech Reporter @dmccabe discuss th…
The Great American Techlash: My Interview in @USATODAY over big tech's troubles in our new AXIOS Harris Poll 100 re… https://t.co/EnueF2NtYr
RT @axios: It turns out a company's reputation — good or bad — doesn't make much difference in the stock market. https://t.co/gJducHbgka
RT @axios: Three major trends from the Axios Harris Poll 100: • Amid privacy scandals, big tech companies took a hit • Elon Musk shows what…
RT @axios: For 20 years, Harris Poll has been measuring the reputations of the most high-profile American companies. This year, for the fir…
Model of Masdar City, Courtesy of Creative Commons
John's Perspective: Building Cities from Within

The age old (or at least Kevin Costner old) statement: “if you build it, they will come,” seems to be the rallying cry for many of the countries who are now coming into technologic prominence due to the effects of the internet.

Take a look at the Abu Dhabi, which is building a new city, dedicated to education, clean technology and progress. Their $18bn Masdar City development is hailed as a mix between a higher education hub and Silicon Valley. But as of yet neither of those goals seem close to being realized.

South Korea is already building its next capital city, Sejong City. A $20bn project expected to house 500,000 people, and become the world’s most technologically advanced capital city while it’s at it.

And now the latest mega-development, the “Silicon Savannah” in Kenya. Officially known as Konza Techno City, this $10bn project being built 60km outside of Nairobi, is projected to create 200,000 new jobs and become the high-tech hub of Kenya’s burgeoning IT economy. Fortune 500 companies and other international conglomerates have purportedly signed on to be part of this development.

Yet, isn’t it interesting that the reason behind Kenya’s new found IT credibility is derived from their widespread use of an exceedingly simple technology? I’m talking about M-PESA. A mobile banking solution that (depending on your source) anywhere from 30-75% of Kenya's daily economy runs through. So what gives? Kenya jumped the need for a banking system infrastructure with the advent of M-PESA and cheap cell phones, so doesn’t this infrastructure-heavy master plan seem out place with the incredibly flexible startup mentality currently pushing innovation in Nairobi and the surrounding areas?

There is no doubt cities need to be dreamed up and built, and it isn’t like this is a 21st Century phenomenon (remember Brasilia?), but did anyone ask the bottom-up entrepreneurs how they might like to see a new city created? It appears, like so many of these projects before Silicon Savannah, like a top-down public-private approach, less of a collaborative approach. And this can affect how people view these glittering cities, not as their own, but instead, living inside of someone else’s single-minded vision. Instead of building a city 60km away, doesn’t it seem like a better plan to serve those entrepreneur catalysts and surround them with the services they need to succeed? We’re often quick to forget where a city’s innovation comes from before we jump into the next mega project to capitalize on this energy.

MindMixer is a company that is taking a bootstrapping approach to community development. By offering a platform for conversation on municipal and community betterment, MindMixer is making it possible for those living in cities to truly get their voice heard. Often times constituents propose an idea for their community, which is then discussed and voted upon by others living in the same neighborhood. Their grassroot energy is shown to those who have the power to enact change--the final result (hopefully) being a positive change to the community that the constituents feel ownership of. These small changes can lead to vibrancy in communities and can provide the same type of benefits, at much lower costs, that are being promised in the built-from-scratch mega cities.

So with apologies to Mr. Costner, maybe it’s time for an update: “If WE build it, WE will come.”